I always use the Fire and Sound Resistance Tables in code for fire ratings, but recently had a municipality tell me I couldn’t for a Part 3 building. They told me because the Tables were titled 9.10.#.# that meant they were only for Part 9.
My questions are:
- Are the fire and sound tables in the code only for Part 9 buildings?
- If the tables are only for Part 9 buildings, why do so many municipalities allow the wall assemblies to be used in Part 3 buildings?
One Response
This is a good question that I see often.
1. Are the fire and sound tables in the code only for Part 9 buildings?
For Part 3 buildings, the acceptable methods for determining fire-resistance ratings are listed in Article 3.1.7.1.:
– Assemblies tested to CAN/ULC-S101 – this will usually be a listed assembly
– Appendix D – many different methods for determining ratings depending on the assembly
– The BC Building Code and Vancouver Building By-law have two additional sentences under Article 3.1.7.1., which allow the use of assemblies R1, M1 or M2 from Table A-9.10.3.1-B (the use of the Part 9 tables is limited to those specific assemblies).
The Part 9 tables can still be used for determining STC ratings, even in Part 3 buildings. This comes from Article 5.8.1.3.
Generally, the preferred approach is to use Appendix D or R1, M1 or M2 assemblies for fire-resistance ratings, since they are not product specific. Listings typically list specific products/manufacturers, and you are technically supposed to follow everything to the letter (can be difficult to do in practice).
2. If the tables are only for Part 9 buildings, why do so many municipalities allow the wall assemblies to be used in Part 3 buildings?
I can’t really say; technically they should not be. Many of the Part 9 assemblies will achieve a rating based on Appendix D, so maybe they are letting it slide if the reference is not done properly. Or maybe they have bigger fish to fry.